The drafting process for my digipak insured that I received Constructive feedback to help me produce another draft until I have a final digipak product. It also helped me develop and change things on my drafts that could potentially make a big difference. From draft 1 to draft 2 there was a dramatic change because my artist was changed so as a group we had to make a whole new star image for our star.
Draft 1
The good things:
- Nice colour scheme for all images
- Inside image demonstrates good star image
What to improve:
- Album name and artist name more clear
- Back missing key info
- Inside CD a bit odd looking
- All ancillary to be consistent
Draft 2
The good things:
Good consistency in images and conventions
Good consistency to advert idea
Like the way the tracks are written
Good consistency to advert idea
Like the way the tracks are written
What to improve:
Give inside image the same effect as front cover.
Front cover looks like a pink effect and the back looks blue.
Back missing production details
Look to do something more basic with CD insert, a bit of an artist overload at the minute.
Front cover looks like a pink effect and the back looks blue.
Back missing production details
Look to do something more basic with CD insert, a bit of an artist overload at the minute.
For our final product, we needed to ensure that our digipack was conventional to the Hip hop/soul genre and still expressing our stars creativity and image. Our digipak has to be consistent with our advert so that all our products can be finalised as a whole product.
Good evidence of drafting your ancillary products here. Each one has been analysed critically which is good.
ReplyDelete